"I ensure my expertise through continuous education, focusing on research concerning legal issues in construction, and participating in organizational activities."
Juha Ryynänen
Doctor of Laws, Licentiate in Economic Sciences
I am an attorney-at-law by profession, a Doctor of Laws and Licentiate of Economic Sciences by education. I have over 30 years of professional experience. I also have a long track record of holding professional positions of trust.
"I ensure my expertise through continuous education, focusing on research concerning legal issues in construction, and participating in organizational activities."
Juha Ryynänen
Doctor of Laws, Licentiate in Economic Sciences
2016
Doctor of Law
University of Helsinki
2001
Licentiate in Economic Sciences
Helsinki School of Economics
1999
Member of the Finnish Bar Association (Attorney-at-Law)
1997
Master of Laws
trained on the bench at the Court of Appeal of Vaasa/Raahe District Court
1994
Master of Laws
University of Lapland, including studies at the Freie Universität Berlin
OTHER LEGAL EXPERTISE
2024
FAI Arbitration Masterclass
2016
The Finnish Arbitration Academy - Finland Chamber of Commerce
2002
Accredited Mediator of the Finnish Bar Association
Language skills
Finnish, English, German, Swedish
OTHER
2016
major (in reserve)
Attorney-at-Law Advocate Juha Ryynänen Ltd.
2008-
Sole practitioner
Procopé & Hornborg Attorneys-at-Law Ltd.
2007-2008
Partner, member of the management team, chief of the Oulu branch office
Chairman of the real estate and construction specialist team
Chairman of the tort law specialist team
Member of the corporate acquisitions and transactions group
Attorneys-at-Law Prudentum Ltd.
2006-2007
Partner, member of the board and management team
Attorneys' House Interlex Ltd.
1999-2006
Partner, CEO, member of the board
Ahokas & Ryynänen Attorneys-at-Law
1994-1999
Partner
Finnish Bar Association
2024–
Member of the Real Estate and Construction Law Specialist Group
2023–
Member of the Strategy Working Group
2020–2023
Member of the board
2017–2020
Vice member of the board
2018–2020
Member of the Real Estate and Construction Law Specialist Group
2013-2020
Member of the Contract and Consumer Law Specialist Group
2001–2017
Defensor Legis, Member of the editing committee
2005-2012
Member of the expert group on civil law, the legal policy committee
2005-2008
Deputy member of the procedural committee
2005-2008
Member of the delegation
2001–2005
Vice member of the delegation
2002–2008
Oulun Branch, vice president
2000–2001
Oulun Branch, member of the board
Oulu Chamber of Commerce
2016–2018
Member of the economics and law committee
2008–2015
Member of the law and tax committee
2001–2008
Chairman of the law and tax committee
Thoughts on Interpretation and Adjustment of Contact Terms.
Juhlajulkaisu Heikki Halila 1952 – 26/5 2022. Edita, Helsinki 2022, p. 431–442.
On Interpretation and Adjustment of Tenancy Agreement, Comments on a Decision.
Edilex, Helsinki 2021.
YSE 1998 and the Rules of Interpretation.
Defensor Legis 3/2019, pp. 359–372.
On Interpretation of General Terms of Construction Agreement.
Edilex, Helsinki 2019.
Constructor´s liability on delay after the period of delay penalty
(Helsinki Court of Appeal 1.2.2018).
Edilex, Helsinki 2018.
Consultant´s Gross Negligence in the Light of a Court Decision
(Helsinki Court of Appeal 11.10.2016).
Edilex, Helsinki 2018.
Construction Contract – Prematurity of a Claim – Interpretation of Contract, Comments on a Decision, Supreme Court
[Urakkasopimus – kanteen ennenaikaisuus – sopimuksen tulkinta – oikeustapauskommentti KKO 2017:14.]
Edilex, Helsinki 2017.
International Construction Projects in Finland.
Construction Law International, March 2017, pp. 9–11.
Construction Contract – Contractual liability after guarantee period – Interpretation of Contract, Comments on a Decision, Supreme Court
[Urakkasopimus – vahingonkorvaus – vastuu takuuajan jälkeen – sopimuksen tulkinta – oikeustapauskommentti KKO 2016:79].
Edilex, Helsinki 2016.
Project Management Contract – Interpretation of Contract, Comments on a Decision, Helsinki Court of Appeal
[Projektinjohtopalvelusopimus – sopimuksen tulkinta, oikeustapauskommentti (HO)].
Edilex, Helsinki 2016.
Variations in Construction Contract
[Urakkasopimuksen muutokset – Sopimusoikeudellinen tutkimus urakkasopimuksen dynaamisuudesta].
Edita, Helsinki 2016.
Construction Disputes in General Courts
[Urakkariidat yleisissä tuomioistuimissa].
Rakentajain kalenteri 2014.
Construction Disputes in Courts of Appeal
[Urakkariidat hovioikeuksissa].
Defensor Legis 5/2013 pp. 855-879.
Preparation by Parties in Civil Cases, Working Group Reports VIII of the Quality Project in the Courts in the Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal of Rovaniemi
[Asianosaisvalmistelu riita-asioissa, Rovaniemen hovioikeuspiirin tuomioistuinten laatuhankkeen työryhmäraportteja VIII] (2007), pp. 123-136.
Marketing of Legal Services in Information Networks
[Asianajopalvelujen markkinointi tietoverkoissa].
Defensor Legis 6/2000, pp. 887-909.
Legal Assignments in the Web Environment, Traditional Contract Law and New Challenges
[Asianajotoimeksiannon syntyminen verkkoympäristössä, perinteinen sopimusoikeus ja uudet haasteet].
Defensor Legis 2/2000, pp. 290-313.
Controlled Foreign Corporation Laws in Finland and in Germany - A Comparative Study. Publications of the Helsinki School of Economics, B-14.
[Väliyhteisölainsäädäntö Suomessa ja Saksassa - oikeusvertailu. Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja, B-14]
Helsinki 1998.
In addition, several expert articles related to law published in several business magazines and newspapers.
Juha Ryynänen
Thesis Defense on 8 April 2016, at the University of Helsinki, Faculty of Law.
The purpose of this study is to answer the following question: How do changes in a construction project affect the contractual relationship between employer and contractor?
Traditionally, the contractual balance has been seen as a static equilibrium between reciprocal rights and duties as set forth by the parties at the time their agreement commences. For example, in a sales contract the seller and buyer determine the balance between goods sold and sales price at the time the contracts commences. The traditional view of contractual balance is best suited to a short-term contract, which is agreed under the assumption of perfect information.
In contrast to a sales agreement, a construction contract is typically a long-term agreement which is incomplete at its birth. A construction contract is typically subject to changes (changes in works, costs and/or timing) that occur during the construction project after the date the agreement commences. Some of the relevant changes result from unexpected changes in circumstances over which the parties have no control, but some are under their control i.e. variation orders given by the employer. Regardless of its origin, a change may have an impact on works (including impact on the scope, timing and order of the works), contract price and/or contract time. In this study works, price and time are described as the dynamic components of a construction contract.
This study proposes a model of contractual balance based on an equilibrium between the dynamic components mentioned above. Changes and the contractual balance are managed through rules of completion.
The rules of completion can be divided into primary and secondary rules of completion. The primary rules of completion include those rules agreed to by the parties in the contract, taking into account the limitations of mandatory rules of law and good building practice. The secondary rules of completion apply to situations not covered by the primary rules of completion. This study identifies four secondary rules of completion: the in dubio contra stipulatorem rule, the in dubio minimis rule, the effectlessness rule (fin. vaikutuksettomuusolettama) and the proportionality rule (in Finnish suhteellisuussääntö).
The rules of completion and their implementation are discussed in detail, taking into account general terms of contract, especially YSE 1998.
I serve my clients throughout Finland.